P.S. Do you have a nonce to use with MT to go with the forced preview? If so, can you email me it?
]]>It’s not actually very good, since I haven’t quite figured out how to use MT::PluginData yet, but at least it ought to slow things down a tiny bit.
]]>Bless you Code Man!
I’ll name my first child after you…no wait a sec…I don’t want kids…well, I’ll name my next kitten after you.
]]>Anyway, it’s on the way to Yahoo. Now why did I admit having to take three shots to get it sort-of right before?
Chin up. You’re the one who told me we can’t expect everything everywhere all the time. Whether they get bored, or we make it too much trouble for the amount of fun trolling you provides, it’ll all be the same in a hundred years.
]]>At least that’s what I’d do … :-)
]]>I’m actually a little worried about the next step. What I’ve got now can be defeated, and I’d like to have James Seng’s MT-Bayesian trained up and ready to tell wheat from chaff, so I could have a two-layer throttle, but if nothing actually makes it through, it’s hard to train. In the last couple of days, I’ve had exactly two hand-entered spams. Hard to build up a good corpus that way. It does its best, and calls them 50%, but then it quite often says that about anyone it hasn’t met yet.
]]>Comments posted by lame-ass robotic scripts? Oh, around here we call those Previews that never get Posted.
Funny, I’ve been getting a lot of those too.
I’m actually a little worried about the next step. What I’ve got now can be defeated, and I’d like to have James Seng’s MT-Bayesian trained up and ready
Phil, Phil. You give up too easily. Why just tonight it occurred to me that every comment-entry form could be a honeypot too. (What’s adding another method to lib/MT/App/Comments.pm
between friends?).
And then there’s the fun one can have with cookies and DOM-scripting …
Why we’ve barely scratched the surface of the games we can play with spambots.
]]>