I give up on depreciated
Giving up is a liberating feeling, in some ways (though in most ways it’s just depressing, yet another failure grinding your soul to dust). So, I’m slightly pleased to note that from now on, when I see someone say that something is depreciated when they mean that it’s deprecated, rather than grinding my teeth while suggesting that they learn the difference (before I beat them senseless), I’ll just go get another fifth of cheap whiskey and a bag of pork rinds, er, let it pass.
This aborted rant started when I was editing a Movable Type Comment Listing Template, and noticed on the way in that it was described as Shown when comment popups (depreciated) are enabled.
I was reasonably sure that comment popups do not lose a percentage of their value for each unit of time which elapses, and although there are those who belittle comment popups, I suspected that Six Apart actually wanted to tell us that their use has been deprecated, that is, disapproved of, and the technical meaning, that they are no longer recommended for use with a threat that at some future time support will be completely removed.
I thought it might be nice to leaven my bile with a little etymology, so I asked the folks at Answers.com about it. I found their answer only somewhat satisfying (the derivation from “to ward off by prayer” is rather nice, but some of their definitions were a touch fuzzy for my taste), but then I made the horrid mistake of asking them about depreciated, where I’m offered only one answer: an incorrect (and long since changed at the source) Wikipedia article claiming that depreciated is a W3C term
, and linking to the letter D in the W3C glossary (one assumes due to incompetence, rather than having considered the alternative, linking to the anchor #deprecated, and … oh, bloody hell, I can’t stand it! How can so many people who are involved with computer software, where individual characters and even bits matter, be so utterly blind to the fact that they are throwing an extra vowel into a word, turning it into another word? That’s it, I’m loading the back of the pickup with cluebats and heading to San Francisco. I’d recommend having
[mt-cvs]$ grep -r "depreciated" ./ [mt-cvs]$
up on your monitors, when I get there to meat you.
Ah, that felt much better than giving up ;)
You know, somebody gave me the smackdown on deprecated vs depreciated back in 1999 and I am still grateful.
I’m with you, chief.
Almost as bad as when they swap one vowel for another, turning it into another word?
I agree with your sentiments, though – it’s the same for so many parts of language though. People just don’t seem to want to take the time to learn for themselves – they hear someone use a word and just assume that person was using it properly. Oh well, a good rant about it usually helps :).
Don’t shoot the wannabees
Heh. I’d forgotten about Henri’s wannabe list, but just to keep my wrath directed at as many different weblog software providers as possible, I was rather bemused by a bit of markup in my WordPress template (or, rather, in the code somewhere, since it’s around the ”Edit this” links):
<strong>|</strong>Semantically speaking, I suppose that says ”no, really, dude, I mean it: vertical bar!”
At least they didn’t use the word ”defecated” Hmmm, maybe that would have been more fitting.
You might be interested in the following from Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day:
BTW, Garner’s Modern American Usage is a handy book to have within arm’s reach.
Knowing your genius I assume that was a clever pun that had something to do with beatings involving a baseball bat.
When I saw the title of this post in my feed reader I clicked instantly, without bothering to scan the article in the feed, because I was so certain there must be something wrong that would cause you to spell deprecated incorrectly in a headline. I was prepared, fingers at the ready, to fire off a friendly, ”sorry, you misspelled ’deprecated’” comment.
I am so relieved.
[...] Phil Ringnalda grinds his teeth when people say depreciated instead of deprecated. I know how he feels. The one that bothers me is hearing people say orientated instead of oriented, as in ”object orientated.” [...]
Well at some point in history popup comments were thought, hard though it maybe be to conceive of, to be a good idea. Thankfully they’ve been depreciated to the point where they’re all but extinct.
Hmmm… I tried, but it still doesn’t scan.
s/they’ve been/general approval of them has/ and it sort-of works.
Though if you don’t care about accessibility (or much of anything else), popup comments fired from
javascript:openComments()are remarkably spam-free.I was going to ding you for “incompetant”, but then I saw “meat you”, and now I’m wondering whether you simply wrote this at 4am in the morning or are actually being facetious.
That was my incompetence in spelling causing me to use incompetance: sadly, it was only 10pm, though after two hours trying to track down a Heisenberg bug it felt more like 4am. But ”meat” was intentional: my ambiguous use of it is rather more clear to people who keep pets that I consider food, but in this case I was looking for an association with tenderizing, if not cannibalism.
I apprecate your rant, irregardless of tool mentioned.
Argh!… (one of mine to give up)
The fact that we’re able to successfully survive encounters with most slips and variations of spelling, usage, style, and grammar just makes me grateful for the ultra-liberal language parsers in our heads, to echo something I said in one of Mark Pilgrim’s roiling comment threads about his copy editor a long time ago.
But you’ll be happy to know that I (and, judging by this post, maybe others) reported the misspelling to Six Apart at the end of August, and it’ll be fixed in the next release.
Yes, it is rather frustrating, but please keep in mind that a lot of people suffer from very light to normal dyslexia, and are possibly making such mistakes unintentionally while still knowing that it is deprecated.
I blame the fact that ’deprecated’ isn’t a word that’s spoken much, and so most people first encounter it in the written form. As our eyes never read every letter when reading, it’s easy to mis-read deprecated as the more-commonly-used ’depreciated’, which, as it has a similar enough meaning, usually fits in the context, it becomes an easy mistake to make.
So, more people using the word ’deprecated’ in everyday speech would go a long way to improving the problem…
I’ll buy that: to me, they are dep·re·cated and de·prec·i·ated, two utterly different words, but if you treat them like Linus bleeping over the Russian names in Dostoyevsky, they don’t seem so different.
However, a plan to use ’deprecated’ in everyday speech is likely to run across Pete’s problem from up the page: to your tongue, there’s very little difference between deprecated and defecated, but to the clients in the big pitch meeting?
OMFG! I’m motified we shipped something with ”deprecated” spelled incorrectly… as 3-time spelling bee champion of my junior high school, I take it as a personal affront. (On the other hand, we’re proud to have a number of people with various reading/writing problems on our staff, as we’ve got dyslexics succeeding in being in senior management, on our board of directors, and in departments like user experience/design. So I’m trying to be less of a spelling nazi these days.)
Anyway, to the issue at hand. First, I will blame Jay Allen. It’s Jay’s fault, ha ha! Second, I will try to get this fixed. Thanks for pointing it out, and please be sensitive to our horrible shame.
Too late, Jacob says he did the right thing and reported it as a bug months ago, so I actually would see the
grepI expect.But at least dyslexia came up often enough to force me to do enough reading to realize that the casual understanding of it as ”swapping letters or reversing whole words” doesn’t really cover it, and if you don’t map visual representations to verbal sounds very well, then the utterly different sounds of the two words don’t jar you when you look at the wrong one.
And since no rant’s complete until the ranter feels like a heel, I guess this one’s done now :)
I like how Anil did not mention the employment of dyslexics in the programming department. ;)
Maybe I should be ”motified” but I’m not…
I meant mortified! That’s a typo! No fair!
You must be joking about deprecated vs depreciated. They mean essentially the same thing. If anything depreciated is closer in meaning to the current usage. Honestly, has anyone every been confused by using one or then other almost identical word? Only anal jargon freaks care much about things like this.
Thanks for clearing that up: I was fooled by the definitions in dictionaries and usage manuals, including the one that Tom quoted above, into thinking that deprecated meant ”disapproved of strongly” while depreciated meant ”belittled, made fun of, mocked.” Now you’ve made it clear that they both mean exactly the same thing, which is, um, whichever you say they mean, I guess.
So, again, go fuck yourself with a chainsaw, which means exactly the same thing as thanks for stopping by.
Anil is right to blame me, but the thing I can’t figure out is that I too am annoyed when people mix up deprecated and depreciated, so believe me, I know the difference.
All I can say, in my defense, is that we were pulling some pretty damn late nights putting the finishing touches on 3.2. Perhaps I was bleary-eyed.
But in either case, I hear you. Thank you for making me annoy myself.
Oh, by the way, now that you’re on WordPress, how about using your mad programming skillz to finally give that piece of software a frigging PREVIEW button?
Yeah, it’s killing me: I keep having to edit my comments depreciating other people’s spelling, because I miss my own typos from not having the chance to preview.
I’ve got a copy of the needs-a-project-page ComPreVal that will give me back preview with an approximation of validation sitting here waiting for me to crunch it together with the threaded comment plugin, but since one’s written in ”stew of HTML and code” and the other’s in ”spew of
echoand"” (I love PHP, really I do, but it sure could do with One True Way of not mixing code and HTML so much), I haven’t quite gotten to it yet. One of these days, when I don’t see something embarrassing right after I post it, I’ll take pity on everyone else too.(Not giving it one in the core I presume is somehow a matter of philosophy, since it’s not like it’s a huge technical challenge, but I haven’t read my way through enough archived arguments yet to know.)
If only ya had gone with Wordform, you would have had preview, edit, and spell for comments AND in-style preview for your posts.
Not to mention an especially sexy look for your admin pages.
And no typos. No, ssurh. Naht mi.
If only you had one-click install set up with DreamHost: you just can’t beat filling in three or four input fields and clicking a button, and having a new weblog system installed in a few minutes, when you are pissed off and ready to move.
For you Phil, I would have done a personal installation. But you never would have been able to say anything critical because, you know, you’d hurt my feelings.
After all, I am my code; my code is me.
There are worse things. I heard some people talking about polygone Klingeltöne, which is German for polygonal ringtones, as opposed to the more familiar and still annoying polyphone=polyphonic ringtones. I really like to hear (or see?) one of those. There are a lot out there.
I was right there with you , until you wrote ”…when I get there to MEAT you.” Whoops. Kinda blows your righteous attitude.
Welcome to my weblog; thanks for stopping by!
There’s just a couple-three of things you need to know about how things are around here:
hey, nice webs you have a here. keep up a the good work!
I’m glad to see that Akismet will still let something that close through: since Google reincuded me a few weeks back, I’m suddenly back up to 700-1000 of those a day, and I have to admit I don’t closely look at that many before dumping them. Or even worry about the way it tells me it caught 1000 and only shows me 150 of them.
Freedom’s just another word for “nothing to lose,” eh…
(Also, “reincuded”?)
If only I could come up with some way of claiming that was intentional.