Protect your browser from “Protect your site from Google’s new toolbar”

When it was just something on Threadwatch I wasn’t too concerned by the JavaScript to silently remove the Google Toolbar-added links that the user had specifically asked for, because the number of people I know who both use Internet Explorer on Windows and would wind up on a Threadwatch reader’s site (it caters to sheep ranchers (sites which funnel in searchers who will click on any search result, however unlikely, and can then be pushed out through an affiliate link) and mushroom farmers (sites whose only chance of a sale is keeping their customer in the dark about any alternative, helped along with a hefty feeding of bullshit)) is quite small.

But, if Jeffrey is going to use it to protect the one and only ISBN to appear in A List Apart, to ensure that no Internet Explorer using reader can easily buy a copy of Writing Effective Use Cases, then perhaps it’s going to spread to other people who need a reminder of just whose browser it is: mine!. Looks like you aren’t allowed to drag links in IE anymore, so right-click, Add to Favorites, and then when you click a toolbar link in your browser intending to affect your copy of a web page so you can navigate to where you want to go without having to select text in your browser, open a new window in your browser, type a URL in your browser, and paste the copied text in a search box in your browser, and the link which you wanted to add in your browser just disappears, click your “mine!” bookmarklet, and as long as the web-hostile-designer didn’t bother to rename the function (excellent odds), they won’t be able to break your browser (until the next page you load, when you’ll have to do it again).

64 Comments

2005-02-24 13:01:59

Phil on the new Google Toolbar

Phil has some excellent thoughts on the new Google toolbar ”auto link” functionality. I must admit, I am on the fence. On one hand, yes, the browser is mine, and as such I should be able to render and modify received content and presentation as I wish….

 
Trackback by Ministry of Information #
2005-02-24 15:28:52

AutoLink ’blocked’

A quick update to that previous posting about Google’s AutoLink ’feature’: Jeffrey Zeldman, of A List Apart, offers a JavaScript, er, script to automatically remove any links added without the author’s permission, defeating AutoLink.

 
2005-02-24 20:04:54

Google Toolbar AutoLinks followup

Let me elaborate a few inches deeper into this.

I believe the issue some ”normal” folks have with this, is the notion of Google (a for-profit) using some of the web’s works to create income.

While this may be true for a lot of modern web based …

 
2005-02-25 07:47:43

Google Toolbar’s AutoLink & The Need For Opt-Out

AutoLink is new feature in the new third version of Google’s popular Google Toolbar that’s raised controversy since it was released last week. Why are publishers upset? Can they block the feature that adds links to their web pages? Who…

 
Trackback by UtterlyBoring.com #
2005-02-27 17:33:41

Google News And Notes

During the last few weeks when I’ve been too stupidly busy to blog as much as I’ve liked, I’ve noticed a bunch of news about Google that kept getting flagged…

 
Trackback by Threadwatch.org #
2005-02-28 05:11:28

Google, Gator – Gator, Google – SNAP!

n/a

 
Comment by Philip Chalmers #
2005-12-23 17:57:12

I’m surprised that the words ”monopoly” and ”cartel” have not appeared in this discussion. As far as I can see, Autolink looks very like a cartel in the making because:

  • It will favour a handful of mega-players in each of the relevant industries. Even if other organisations can request that they be included:
    • Google has finite resources, and will probably prioritise requests from large companies which its staff don’t need to check out first.
    • I’d bet that the biggest players will get the top places in the list of options presented to the user.
    • Pretty soon Google will have to close some lists to new entrants because adding more would make the list unusable.
  • This will make it harder for new competitors to enter the market. Without new entrants or at least a credible threat of new entrants, all market leaders focus on improving profit margins rather than on innovation or improving customer value for money. Obviously this is ultimately bad for consumers.
Comment by Aristotle Pagaltzis #
2005-12-23 21:19:25

Uhm. Does anyone even care anymore?

First off, Autolink needs to be enabled explicitly, to begin with, and even then it only affects very specific items (unlike, say, Microsoft’s SmartTag feature that would linkifiy words left and right), and even then only if these items are already part of a link. By sheer odds I can’t imagine that having any measurable impact on anyone’s traffic.

After the dust from the storm of protest following its release about 11 months ago settled, dead silence set in. I haven’t heard a peep about it in at least 8 months. I take that to mean that Autolink turned out to be exactly the non-issue that most sensible people expected.

Comment by Aristotle Pagaltzis #
2005-12-23 21:22:28

only if these items are already part of a link.

I mean, of course, “are not already part of a link.”

 
Comment by Phil Ringnalda #
2005-12-23 21:33:17